Get a Free Packaging Sample with Your Wire FIND OUT HOW
At REELEX Packaging Solutions takes pride in superior customer service and is fully committed to supporting the needs of all REELEX licensees. Our service line doesn’t sleep. Technicians are available by phone or video 24/7/365 to diagnose, troubleshoot, and guide your team. Our highly regarded technicians can be almost anywhere in the world in 48 hours or less. Always On. Always Count on REELEX.
September 26, 2025
This Technical Service Bulletin is to inform you of updated information related to availability
and ordering of replacement drives for your REELEX equipment.
Revised September 26, 2025
This revised Technical Service Bulletin is to inform you of updated information related to
our bulletin from 2021 and update the information of March 11, 2025.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Compared to equivalent packaging, REELEX is the cheapest cost per package even with usage fees. Because the REELEX coil does not require an inner support structure, the package is greatly simplified compared to a spool or reel-in-a-box. As a result, REELEX packaging costs is approximately 50% less than equivalent spool packaging, even including the usage fee.
Sales
sales@reelex.com
Support
support@reelex.com
Receivables
accountsreceivable@reelex.com
Payables
accountspayable@reelex.com
Copyright ©2025 REELEX Packaging Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved
